Luna The Panthera 價格LUNA

Terra ($LUNA ) Ecosystem — Data-Based, Short & War-Oriented The Terra collapse wasn’t emotional — it was mathematical. Key Numbers (Reality Check) • LUNA price: from ~$119 (Apr 2022) → ~$0.0001 at bottom → ~99.99% drawdown • Supply: from ~350M LUNA → 6.5+ trillion LUNA after death spiral • TVL: from $30–40B peak → <$200M post-collapse → >99% capital destruction • UST: depegged from $1 → ~$0.02 at lows • Current activity: volume spikes mostly come from retail speculation, not ecosystem growth What This Means • Tokenomics were structurally broken, not unlucky • LUNA absorbed losses but had no real demand floor • Any pump since is liquidity-driven, not usage-driven Community vs Reality • Social engagement stays high • On-chain usage and dev activity stay flat or declining ____________ Bull case: extreme volatility = tradable hype asset Bear case: irreversible trust loss + dead capital base ____________ If 99% of capital is gone and supply exploded 18,000x, 👉 Are you investing — or just gambling on memory? Pick a side. $BTC $ETH

BlockBeats News, December 25th, after a year of gradually clarifying regulatory environment and differentiated market performance, several top VCs have started to reevaluate the value proposition of the 2025 crypto industry. In a recent podcast, Pantera Capital Partner Mason Nystrom, Hash3 Co-Founder Hootie Rashidifard, and Variant Partner Alana Levin unanimously agreed that stablecoins, prediction markets, and traditional finance and internet incumbents were the biggest winners this year.Nystrom pointed out that established companies like Robinhood quickly moved after regulatory clarity, significantly accelerating their crypto strategy in 2025, "well anticipating where the puck is going to go."Rashidifard stated that stablecoin trading volume and profitability have surged, "Tether has become one of the most profitable companies per capita." He emphasized that stablecoins not only make money now but also truly provide fundamental financial value to end users.Levin listed prediction markets as one of the fastest-growing tracks in 2025, with Kalshi and Polymarket dispelling doubts about "volume padding" and "solely betting on elections." She specifically mentioned that Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) invested $2 billion in Polymarket this year, which was impressive.Looking at it from the perspective of failures:On a personal level: Levin called out Terraform Labs Co-Founder Do Kwon. He was sentenced to 15 years in prison in December for fraud related to the collapse of Terra, considered a landmark failure case in the industry.On an institutional level: Rashidifard believed that the U.S. SEC during the "Biden era" was one of the institutional failures, as long-term tough enforcement did not bring about actual regulatory results but instead forced many entrepreneurs to leave. He pointed out that with Gensler stepping down, the passage of the GENIUS stablecoin bill, and the advancement of market structure legislation, the U.S. government's attitude toward the crypto industry underwent a fundamental shift in 2025.

Investors are closely tracking the latest binance listings as Binance Spot prepares to expand its roster of tradable pairs later this month. Summary New trading pairs coming to Binance Spot Fee incentives and regional restrictions Price reaction of newly supported tokens The contrasting effect of delistings New trading pairs coming to Binance Spot On December 24, crypto exchange Binance will introduce five new spot trading pairs on its main platform. The exchange confirmed that it will open trading for ADA/USD1, ASTER/USD1, LUNA/USDC, LUNC/USDC, and ZEC/USD1 on Binance Spot on that date. Moreover, the platform will activate Trading Bots services for all five pairs at launch. This allows automated strategies to operate immediately, which can support liquidity and narrow spreads from the first trading sessions. Binance stressed that it regularly reviews its product lineup to align services with current market trends and to enhance the overall user experience. However, the company also underlined that access to these new trading pairs will remain subject to local regulations and existing compliance controls. Fee incentives and regional restrictions The exchange clarified that users will benefit from discounted taker fees on all existing and new USDC spot and margin trading pairs until further notice. This incentive covers both the fresh additions and earlier USDC markets on the platform. However, not all customers will be able to use the new services. Binance specified that residents of Canada, Cuba, Iran, the Netherlands, the USA, and certain other restricted jurisdictions are excluded from the upcoming offering. That said, the new pairs remain accessible to a broad global user base where regulations allow. Price reaction of newly supported tokens Historically, strong exchange backing can influence token performance. Support from a major venue such as Binance often results in higher liquidity, improved visibility, and stronger brand credibility for the listed assets. In the run-up to the new binance listings, several of the affected cryptocurrencies have already posted notable gains. Cardano’s ADA has risen by 4% over the last 24 hours and is currently trading around $0.37, while Aster (ASTER) is up 3.5% on the day at approximately $0.72. Terra (LUNA) has delivered the most pronounced move among the tokens tied to the new pairs, jumping 13% over the past day. Moreover, Terra Luna Classic (LUNC) and Zcash (ZEC) have also advanced, although their increases have been more modest compared to LUNA’s rally. It is important to note that the broader upswing in the digital asset market may also be boosting these prices. Bitcoin (BTC) recently climbed above $90,000, while Ethereum (ETH) has reclaimed the key psychological mark of $3,000, improving sentiment across altcoins. The contrasting effect of delistings While new markets can support valuations, delistings often trigger the opposite reaction. Binance periodically removes specific trading pairs, or even all services for certain cryptocurrencies, due to factors such as persistently low trading volume, weak liquidity, or concerns around network stability and security. In those cases, the removed assets tend to register sharp declines shortly after announcements. In September this year, Binance halted all services for BakerySwap (BAKE), Hifi Finance (HIFI), and Self Chain (SLF). Mere hours after the disclosure, each of the affected altcoins suffered double-digit percentage losses. A similar pattern emerged in October, when Binance delisted Flamingo (FLM), Kadena (KDA), and Perpetual Protocol (PERP). However, KDA faced the harshest reaction, with its price plunging by 30% following the announcement, underscoring how sensitive smaller tokens can be to exchange decisions. Overall, Binance’s latest spot additions, fee incentives, and selective market removals highlight how listing and delisting decisions can significantly influence liquidity, visibility, and short-term price dynamics across the crypto ecosystem.

Jump Trading faces a $4 billion lawsuit filed by Terraform Labs’ bankruptcy administrator related to the 2022 Terra ecosystem collapse, according to the Wall Street Journal. This legal action potentially affects LUNA and UST assets, stirring concerns about past market manipulations and future regulatory scrutiny. A lawsuit against Jump Trading has emerged, seeking $4 billion in damages due to its alleged involvement in the Terra Labs collapse. The collapse centers around accusations related to the manipulation of cryptocurrencies like LUNA and UST. The lawsuit was filed by Terraform Labs’ bankruptcy administrator, targeting Jump Trading for purportedly manipulating market prices during the collapse. The case involves Jump Trading’s use of high-frequency strategies to benefit from distorted currency valuations. The lawsuit could have significant implications for the cryptocurrency landscape. Financial repercussions on companies connected with Terra, including valuation disruptions, could arise, impacting investor trust and market stability. Potential political fallout may result if regulatory bodies opt to increase scrutiny of crypto trading activities. “The current situation may draw from past allegations against Jump Trading regarding UST manipulation,” which could lead to extended financial ramifications influencing high-frequency trading entities and proprietary firms engaged in similar activities. The lawsuit reflects ongoing challenges in crypto regulation, focusing on transparency and market fairness. Historical trends indicate increased legal actions in the crypto space, emphasizing the need for enhanced regulatory frameworks to safeguard market integrity. Insights into financial, regulatory, or technological outcomes are essential, given the lawsuit’s scope. Understanding its influence on investment patterns and regulatory approaches toward crypto assets is key. Historical precedents offer a backdrop for potential industry changes.