Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnWeb3SquareMore
Trade
Spot
Buy and sell crypto with ease
Margin
Amplify your capital and maximize fund efficiency
Onchain
Going Onchain, without going Onchain!
Convert & block trade
Convert crypto with one click and zero fees
Explore
Launchhub
Gain the edge early and start winning
Copy
Copy elite trader with one click
Bots
Simple, fast, and reliable AI trading bot
Trade
USDT-M Futures
Futures settled in USDT
USDC-M Futures
Futures settled in USDC
Coin-M Futures
Futures settled in cryptocurrencies
Explore
Futures guide
A beginner-to-advanced journey in futures trading
Futures promotions
Generous rewards await
Overview
A variety of products to grow your assets
Simple Earn
Deposit and withdraw anytime to earn flexible returns with zero risk
On-chain Earn
Earn profits daily without risking principal
Structured Earn
Robust financial innovation to navigate market swings
VIP and Wealth Management
Premium services for smart wealth management
Loans
Flexible borrowing with high fund security
Supreme Court to Rule on Whether Trump's Tariffs Exceed Presidential Powers

Supreme Court to Rule on Whether Trump's Tariffs Exceed Presidential Powers

Bitget-RWA2025/11/07 15:18
By:Bitget-RWA

- U.S. Supreme Court will decide if Trump's 50% "Liberation Day" tariffs violate constitutional limits on executive power. - Legal challenge argues IEEPA doesn't authorize unbounded tariffs, with lower courts ruling against the 2019-2021 measures. - Economists estimate tariffs cost households $1,800/year while generating $223B revenue for Treasury. - Ruling could redefine presidential trade authority, either limiting future unilateral actions or expanding executive power precedents.

The forthcoming decision by the U.S. Supreme Court regarding President Donald Trump’s extensive “Liberation Day” tariffs could significantly alter the distribution of authority between Congress and the executive branch, potentially impacting both the economy and global trade. The dispute, Learning Resources Inc. v. Trump, questions whether Trump exceeded his constitutional powers by using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to implement tariffs up to 50% on imports from almost every nation, as highlighted in a

. Previous rulings by lower courts, including the U.S. Court of International Trade, have found the tariffs unlawful, stating that IEEPA does not grant the president unlimited tariff authority.

This legal battle gained traction after a blog post by George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin prompted a group of small businesses to challenge the tariffs, arguing that they represent an unconstitutional overreach of executive power, according to a

.
Supreme Court to Rule on Whether Trump's Tariffs Exceed Presidential Powers image 0
Central to the case is a constitutional issue: While IEEPA permits the president to control commerce in emergencies, opponents contend that imposing tariffs—a responsibility traditionally reserved for Congress—requires explicit legislative approval, as discussed in an .

The Trump administration maintains that the tariffs are essential to address what it calls a “national emergency” caused by trade deficits, which it argues endanger American industries and national security. Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued before the court that IEEPA empowers the president to “regulate” imports, including through tariffs, during emergencies, according to the

. Nonetheless, the justices voiced doubts, with Chief Justice John Roberts pointing out that tariffs function as “a tax,” and that the Constitution’s Article I gives Congress sole authority over taxation, as noted in .

Experts caution that these tariffs have already increased annual costs for the average household by $1,800, according to

, while the Treasury has amassed more than $223 billion in tariff revenue since April, as reported by . Should the Supreme Court invalidate the tariffs, companies may be eligible for refunds, and trade deals with nations such as the U.K. and China could be jeopardized, analysts warn. On the other hand, if the tariffs are upheld, it could empower future presidents to independently alter trade policy, setting a precedent for broader executive authority, as argued in a .

Although the court’s 6-3 conservative majority has often sided with the Trump administration, justices including Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett have voiced concerns about unchecked executive power. If the court rules against the tariffs, Trump may have to depend on more limited statutes, such as the Trade Act of 1974, which only permits temporary, targeted tariffs.

As deliberations continue, the case has attracted international interest, with countries like Singapore and India watching for possible changes in U.S. trade policy. The ruling, anticipated by December, will not only decide the future of Trump’s tariffs but will also influence the legal boundaries for presidential action in economic and foreign policy.

0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Earn new token airdrops
Lock your assets and earn 10%+ APR
Lock now!

You may also like

Defying Market Swings: $NNZ's Tactical Approach to Crypto

- Bitget report highlights Noomez's $NNZ token as a 2025 bull run contender with 280x price potential via its 28-stage presale model. - Deflationary mechanics include token burns at key milestones, 15% locked liquidity, and double staking rewards for early adopters. - Community-driven features like "Noom Recruit" referral program and transparent Noom Gauge dashboard aim to build trust and adoption. - Analysts note $NNZ's structured approach addresses meme coin volatility while aligning with 2025 trends fav

Bitget-RWA2025/11/08 05:48
Defying Market Swings: $NNZ's Tactical Approach to Crypto

Growing Institutional Focus on Momentum (MMT)

- Momentum (MMT) token surged 1330% post-Binance listing, driven by $10M funding and institutional backing from Coinbase , OKX, and Jump Crypto. - On-chain data shows $12B 30-day DEX volume and $265M TVL, but analysts warn of speculative risks amid 224% 24-hour volatility spikes. - Institutional capital shifts toward Bitcoin/ETH staking ($6.1B combined inflows) raise questions about MMT's long-term viability without proven real-world utility. - Upcoming ve(3,3) DEX and RWA integrations aim to enhance MMT's

Bitget-RWA2025/11/08 05:46
Growing Institutional Focus on Momentum (MMT)

AAVE -3.37% 7-Day Surge Despite Year-Long Downtrend as Market Integrates

- Aave's AAVE token fell 0.89% in 24 hours to $207.68 despite a 3.37% 7-day rally amid strategic integrations. - Aave Horizon's partnership with VanEck's VBILL tokenized Treasury fund enables institutional-grade collateral via Chainlink and Securitize infrastructure. - The integration creates arbitrage opportunities with 4.84%+ potential returns through VBILL collateralized RLUSD borrowing strategies. - Backtests show Aave outperformed BTC by +14.54% over 30 days post-announcement, with 67% positive excess

Bitget-RWA2025/11/08 05:28

Kyo Achieves $1 Billion Valuation: Wagering on Cross-Chain DeFi Integration During Industry Upheaval

- Kyo Finance secures $5M Series A at $1B valuation, aiming to unify blockchain liquidity via cross-chain interoperability. - DeFi faces innovation vs. security tensions as projects like Mutuum advance infrastructure while crises like Stream Finance's $93M loss expose systemic risks. - Industry responds with risk mitigation tools (e.g., RedStone ratings) and modular infrastructure reforms to address contagion risks from interconnected lending markets. - Kyo's valuation reflects institutional confidence in

Bitget-RWA2025/11/08 05:16