The day $300 trillion appeared and then vanished on Ethereum
For a few surreal moments on Oct. 15, the Ethereum blockchain seemed to host the financial equivalent of a dream.
Paxos, the issuer behind PayPal’s stablecoin PYUSD, accidentally minted $300 trillion worth of tokens, which is roughly 300 times the global GDP, before burning them just as fast.
The minting, visible on Ethereum’s public ledger, sent analysts, traders, and bots into overdrive.
Within minutes, Paxos confirmed the incident resulted from an internal operational error, not a hack. The firm said no user funds were impacted.
Still, the sheer number involved in the mistake made “PYUSD” the most discussed coin in crypto for 24 hours straight. Blockchain analytics firm Santiment reported thousands of mentions per minute as social media reacted in disbelief.
What happened?
Blockchain security firm Quill Audits traced the mishap to the token’s contract structure.
According to the security firm, the PYUSD contract gave one externally owned address (EOA) unrestricted minting and burning rights with no rate limits, amount caps, or multi-party approvals.
It added that the single key executed three transactions in quick succession: minting $300 trillion PYUSD, burning it, and then minting another $300 billion.
Considering this, Quill Audits concluded that:
“This suggests a backend system bug or a catastrophic human error— or all two.”
Meanwhile, Sam Ramirez, lead engineer at Argentum, suggested that Paxos initially meant to transfer 300 million PYUSD between wallets but mistakenly burned it.
According to him, the attempt to restore those tokens allegedly resulted in the 300-trillion overmint.
Lessons?
The Paxos mistake might have been harmless, but its implications aren’t. Over $300 billion in stablecoins now circulate globally, moving billions daily across Ethereum, Solana, and Tron.
At that scale, even a single automation error could cascade through decentralized lending protocols, liquidity pools, and payment rails. Notably, the error resulted in Aave, the largest DeFi protocol, freezing PYUSD transactions.
Considering this, the glitch has reignited debates about how stable collateralization should work.
Unlike algorithmic stablecoins, asset-backed tokens such as PYUSD rely on off-chain reserves, such as US Treasuries and cash equivalents held in the issuer’s custody, to maintain their peg.
Critics argue that the ability to mint new tokens without immediate proof of collateral contradicts the entire model.
Chainlink’s Zach Ryan argued that the event could have been prevented altogether with Proof of Reserve (PoR) checks built directly into minting contracts. He said:
“This prevents ‘infinite mint attacks’ where a massive amount of unbacked tokens are minted, putting at risk all the markets that list and support the token.”
Chainlink is an Oracle blockchain network that acts as a secure bridge between blockchains and external, real-world data.
Moreover, the incident has shed light on why financial regulators have recently become significantly interested in the emerging sector.
Like Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller recently pointed out in a September speech, digital payment systems must be “hardened against misuse, with redundancy and safeguards that match the scale of global payments.”
He wasn’t speaking about Paxos specifically, but the message fits. The infrastructure now underpinning billions in daily settlements cannot rely on goodwill or reaction speed alone.
The post The day $300 trillion appeared and then vanished on Ethereum appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Short the dip and buy the rip? What FOMC outcomes reveal about Bitcoin price action

Bitcoin Leverage Liquidation: Does It Pose a Systemic Threat to Retail Crypto Investors?
- October 2025's Bitcoin crash triggered $19B in leveraged liquidations, exposing crypto derivatives' fragility amid extreme retail leverage and thin liquidity. - High leverage (up to 1,001:1) and perpetual futures dominated by platforms like Hyperliquid amplified volatility, creating self-reinforcing downward spirals. - Behavioral biases (FOMO, overconfidence) and social media echo chambers drove irrational leveraged bets, while regulators paused risky ETFs and warned of systemic risks. - The crisis highl

LUNA up 46.13% in 24 hours as network improvements increase investor optimism
- LUNA surged 46.13% in 24 hours, driven by a pending network upgrade and rising investor confidence. - Futures open interest for LUNC rose to $25.55M, signaling new capital inflows and bullish momentum. - The terrad v3.6.1 upgrade, set for Dec 18, aims to enhance security and resolve legacy contract issues after successful testnet trials. - Technical indicators and analyst projections suggest continued upward momentum, targeting $0.000098 weekly if the 50-week EMA is sustained.

LUNA up 24.4% in 24 hours: Surge Fueled by Upgrades and Increased Inflows
- LUNA surged 24.4% in 24 hours on Dec 10, 2025, driven by rising on-chain activity, capital inflows, and anticipation of a major network upgrade. - The terrad v3.6.1 upgrade, set for Dec 18, aims to resolve legacy contract issues and enhance security, with successful testnet trials and rollback options in place. - Futures open interest rose to $25.55M, while technical indicators suggest continued bullish momentum, targeting $0.000098 resistance if the 50-week EMA is sustained. - Legal proceedings against

