Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnSquareMore
Crypto fundamentals 101 Chapter 2: Pricing power

Crypto fundamentals 101 Chapter 2: Pricing power

DeFi ManDeFi Man2023/09/29 03:48
By:DeFi Man

1. Introduction

We dedicated the last chapter to analyze one of the most important metrics in revenue generation, and this week we will focus on the main profit lever, as that is what should be the main proxy to determine how good or bad a business is.

In the words of one of the best fundamentals investors out there….

“The single most important decision in evaluating a business is pricing power. If you’ve got the power to raise prices without losing business to a competitor, you’ve got a very good business. And if you have to have a prayer session before raising the price by 10 percent, then you’ve got a terrible business”

Warren Buffet

We could agree it is quite important right? Are you still not convinced anon?

Let’s say we could define the profits of a company like:

Total profits = Profit/unit * Nºunits Profit/unit = Price/unit - Cost/unit

This shows how powerful for a company is to be able to raise prices with damaging the demand for their product or service.

Apple is the perfect example, one of the best performing assets of the last 20 years and arguably the best example of pricing power capabilities.

2. Pricing power in crypto

Usually users are willing to pay a premium when they feel there is potential to gain more money.

It shows very clearly in the difference of fees between NFT marketplaces general exchanges. Really difficult to charge 1% of fees on general exchanges with binance charging 0.1% while most NFT marketplaces get away with 2% fees. This is mainly due to the latter being less mature and with a higher appreciation potential (p.e. easier to pull a x50 in NFTs than listed coins)

Pricing power is influenced by many factors:

  • Brand: GMX commands a premium versus other new competitors, as LP traders perceive it as “safer”

  • Industry and market segment: Binance Coinbase have very different fees, because they target different users

  • Competitive landscape: Usually when an space is overcrowded with competitors, projects undercut each other in fees till there is little margin left

  • Others

Several metrics could be used to define pricing power in crypto, but we will use the following:

Pricing power = Fees / Volume

Basically this metric compares how many cents each user is willing to pay for each dollar traded in the protocol

3. Current state of the market

Biggest differences in crypto pricing power are driven by use case, there are of course differences within protocols in the same segment as we have stated in the previous section, but those tend to be small on average, so we will focus on analyzing each DeFi category to obtain a better insight.

Biggest categories in DeFi are the following:

Structured Products: Ribbon Finance, StakeDao, GLP products etc

Lending: AAVE, Compound etc

ETH staking: Lido etc

Options: Lyra, Premia, Hegic, Dopex etc

NFT marketplaces: Opensea, Looksrare, X2Y2, Blur etc

Spot DEX: Uniswap, Sushiswap, Balancer etc

Perp DEX: GMX, DyDx, GNS etc

After analyzing the market leaders in each segment we obtain the following numbers, which intend to be ball-park estimates:

Crypto fundamentals 101 Chapter 2: Pricing power image 0

Not all pricing powers are created equal though…

As you might have already noticed, there is another important variable that affects the profit generation of a protocol, and that is the average length of the “trade” - conceptually that volume is “locked” and cannot be reused by other users.

To explain this better, let’s use a couple of examples make it clearer. If you trade in Uniswap, the length of the trade is 1 second and you will pay 0,3% fee but if you deposit in AAVE, the average time of the deposit will be a year on average and you will be earning 5% of the deposit “volume” through that 365 days. That means that to make things comparable, we need to use another metric:

Pricing power corrected by time = Pricing power / Trade length
Crypto fundamentals 101 Chapter 2: Pricing power image 1

Once we have corrected the metric to include how powerful the pricing power is related to how frequently it can be enforced, a clear winner emerges, NFT marketplaces.

The fact that the average length is near instant and they command a 2% fee on average of all transactions makes it a real powerful contender.

On the other hand, lending and ETH staking are the laggards in this metric, but they compensate it being business that typically have lots of TVL.

4. Conclusions

NFT marketplaces are the best businesses regarding pricing power, time will tell whether they achieve to maintain such high pricing margins as the industry matures and more players compete, but if NFT volumes get back, these protocols will be among the biggest cash cows out there and I believe that those distributing part of that profits among token holders ($LOOKS, $X2Y2) could fare well, specially if the manage to grab more liquidity from Opensea.

Option protocols are also an interesting category specially in the altcoin pools that command higher premiums vs BTC/ETH pools.

5. Final remarks

Thanks for reading! Hope you enjoyed it reading as much as I writing it.

Next article will be focused on supply vs demand, specifically tokenomics :)

Crypto fundamentals 101 will always be free, but if you leverage trade and want to give GMX a try, feel free to use my ref code to obtain a 10% discount on fees and collaborate with content creation.

Crypto fundamentals 101 Chapter 2: Pricing power image 2
Cheers!
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Earn new token airdrops
Lock your assets and earn 10%+ APR
Lock now!

You may also like

Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 Encounters Houthi Challenges Amidst Growth in Trade and Technology

- Saudi Arabia strengthens regional trade ties with Egypt, aiming to boost 86% of Egyptian firms' trade under Vision 2030, focusing on tech and energy sectors. - Chinese aesthetic tech firm Aphranel showcases innovations at Saudi medical congress, highlighting growing Middle East market integration. - Houthi threats in Yemen persist, raising regional security risks that could hinder Saudi economic ambitions and foreign investment goals. - Saudi-Egyptian investment agreements aim to enhance legal frameworks

Bitget-RWA2025/11/30 16:44
Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 Encounters Houthi Challenges Amidst Growth in Trade and Technology

"Retail's Digital Revolution: Black Friday's 9.1% Online Spike Signals New Consumer Era" <div>Retail's Digital Revolution: Black Friday's 9.1% Online Spike Signals New Consumer Era</div> 改写: <div>The Digital Shift in Retail: Black Friday Sees 9.1% Surge in Online Sales, Marking a New Age for Shoppers</div>

- U.S. online Black Friday spending hit $11.8B in 2025, a 9.1% surge driven by AI tools and social media campaigns. - In-store traffic fell 3.6% as shoppers spread purchases across extended promotions, while tariffs pushed average prices up 7% despite 1% lower order volumes. - Holiday sales are projected to reach $1.01-$1.02 trillion, reflecting a 3.7-4.2% growth but slower than 2023's 4.3% increase. - Scams targeted 31% of U.S. adults, while grassroots boycotts against Trump-linked retailers emerged, thou

Bitget-RWA2025/11/30 16:44
"Retail's Digital Revolution: Black Friday's 9.1% Online Spike Signals New Consumer Era"

<div>Retail's Digital Revolution: Black Friday's 9.1% Online Spike Signals New Consumer Era</div>

改写:

<div>The Digital Shift in Retail: Black Friday Sees 9.1% Surge in Online Sales, Marking a New Age for Shoppers</div>

Bitcoin News Today: Surging Institutional Interest Pushes BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF to $70 Billion

- BlackRock's IBIT bitcoin ETF surged to $70.7B in 341 days, generating $245M annual fees as top revenue driver. - U.S. spot bitcoin ETF approval fueled institutional demand, with IBIT capturing 3% of total bitcoin supply. - BlackRock increased its own IBIT stake by 14%, despite $2.34B November outflows deemed "normal" for retail-driven products. - ETF resilience shown through $21.1M November 27 inflow, reinforcing bitcoin's strategic role amid macroeconomic uncertainties.

Bitget-RWA2025/11/30 16:44

Hyperliquid News Today: Hayes-Hon Dispute Highlights the Rift Between Crypto Fundamentals and Market Hype

- Monad's MON token collapsed 40% in three days, triggering $6M+ liquidations on HyperLiquid as high-FDV projects face volatility risks. - Arthur Hayes criticized MON's 90% locked supply as a "hot potato" scheme, while founder Keone Hon defended its C++/Rust architecture and 1-second finality. - Whale wallets lost $1.9M-$4.17M in leveraged positions, highlighting systemic risks in low-liquidity tokens amid spoofed transfers and declining trading volume. - The debate underscores crypto's infrastructure vs.

Bitget-RWA2025/11/30 16:28
Hyperliquid News Today: Hayes-Hon Dispute Highlights the Rift Between Crypto Fundamentals and Market Hype