Usualの‌価格USUAL

BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, is exploring how to bring one of Wall Street’s most popular investment vehicles into the blockchain era. According to a Bloomberg report, the New York-based firm is weighing how to tokenize exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tied to real-world assets such as stocks, subject to regulatory considerations. The move follows BlackRock’s earlier ventures into digital assets. In 2024, the company launched its tokenized money-market fund BUIDL, which has grown to more than $2 billion in assets and has gained traction across crypto platforms. That launch came shortly after the blockbuster debut of its spot Bitcoin ETF, which quickly became one of the most successful funds of its kind. ETFs Could Bridge Wall Street and Crypto Through Tokenization Tokenization involves creating blockchain-based versions of traditional financial assets. In the case of ETFs, digitization could facilitate trading outside Wall Street’s usual hours, allow easier international access, and create new possibilities for using shares as collateral within crypto networks. Advocates argue that tokenization can deliver instant settlement, fractional ownership, and more efficient market structures. The concept is beginning to gain momentum across the financial industry. Asset managers, including Franklin Templeton, have already issued tokenized share classes of money-market funds. BlackRock has consistently positioned itself as an early mover in this space. The company has previously tested tokenized fund shares on JPMorgan’s Onyx blockchain, now known as Kinexys, and Chief Executive Officer Larry Fink has repeatedly said he believes every financial asset can ultimately be tokenized. In his 2025 annual letter to investors, Fink reiterated that tokenization has the potential to transform financial markets. The scale of the opportunity is vast. According to new research from Animoca Brands, tokenization of real-world assets could eventually tap into the $400 trillion traditional finance market. Additionally, Animoca reported that the tokenized RWA market has already hit an all-time high of $26.5 billion in 2025, a 70% increase since the start of the year. Most of that growth has been concentrated in private credit and U.S. Treasuries, which together account for nearly 90% of tokenized value. Other reports indicate the accelerating pace of adoption. The 2025 Skynet RWA Security Report projected that the tokenized RWA market could reach $16 trillion by 2030, with U.S. Treasuries leading near-term growth. Tokenized treasuries alone are expected to reach $4.2 billion this year. The report added that both traditional banks and blockchain-native firms are experimenting with RWA products for yield generation and liquidity management. Institutions Bet on ETFs as Proving Ground for Tokenized Markets Institutional interest is also evident in new market launches. In September, Ondo Finance rolled out Ondo Global Markets, a platform offering tokenized access to over 100 U.S. stocks and ETFs for eligible non-U.S. investors. The service, currently live on Ethereum, allows 24/5 minting and redeeming of tokenized securities backed one-to-one by underlying assets held at U.S.-registered broker-dealers. In Asia, Japanese conglomerate SBI Holdings partnered with crypto infrastructure provider Startale in August to develop an institutional-grade on-chain platform for tokenized stocks and RWAs. The partners estimate the global opportunity for tokenized assets could reach $18.9 trillion by 2033. They say their platform will provide 24/7 trading, cross-border settlement, and fractional ownership capabilities. Despite the optimism, major hurdles remain. Traditional ETFs settle through Wall Street’s clearinghouses, while tokenized assets move instantly and continuously. Reconciling these systems raises regulatory and custodial challenges. Still, policymakers in the United States have indicated greater openness to controlled testing of blockchain-based markets. Nasdaq has also sought approval to allow tokenized stock trading on its exchange, a move that could bring blockchain technology into the core of U.S. equities. BlackRock Ramps Up Digital Asset Push With $79.6B Under Management BlackRock is accelerating its expansion into digital assets, reporting $14.1 billion in net inflows for the second quarter of 2025 as of July. The surge lifted the firm’s digital assets under management (AUM) to $79.6 billion, just 1% of its $12.5 trillion total, but it is among its fastest-growing segments. Digital products accounted for $14 billion of the firm’s $85 billion in overall ETF inflows during the quarter. Year-to-date, inflows have reached $17 billion, showing continued institutional demand despite market volatility. The products generated $40 million in base fees and securities lending revenue in Q2, a modest figure compared with traditional classes, but showing a new stream of yield from crypto. The firm’s flagship spot Bitcoin ETF, IBIT, has drawn $6.96 billion in 2025 inflows, surpassing the SPDR Gold Trust to become the sixth most popular U.S. ETF.

I’m glad I went ahead with the deposit ended up selling my tokens about an hour before the dip, and the timing couldn’t have been better. What really stands out about Bitget is how they keep supporting new projects, especially through campaigns like CandyBomb. Right now, traders can trade and deposit to share in a massive 6,450,000 $LINEA reward pool. It’s a smart way to stack extra gains on top of your usual trading profits.

𝐔𝐒𝐃𝐦 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐌𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐄𝐓𝐇: 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐈𝐬 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞? TL;DR USDm is issued on Ethena’s USDtb rails and backed primarily by tokenized U.S. Treasuries (BlackRock BUIDL via Securitize). The reserve yield is programmatically routed to cover MegaETH sequencer OPEX, so gas can be priced at cost while keeping fees stable as throughput scales. Integration is deep across wallets, paymasters, and apps on @megaeth_labs. USDT0 and cUSD remain first-class assets. ------ 📌 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐩𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐤 1. Economic layer → Reserves: USDm v1 uses the USDtb reserve model: ~target 90% BUIDL (tokenized short-duration Treasuries) held via Securitize, plus liquid stables for redemptions. It has 24/7 atomic swaps between USDtb and BUIDL, which tighten settlement and transparency. → Yield source: BUIDL’s T-bill yield accrues on reserves such that yield is earmarked to fund sequencer costs on MegaETH. 2. Issuance → Issuer rails: Ethena provides the stablecoin stack (contracts, treasury operations, reserve disclosures). USDm adapts its collateral mix over time. → Compliance/custody: USDtb has a clear path toward compliance (GENIUS Act notes with Anchorage) and institutional integrations. 3. Execution & Settlement → Chain integration: MegaETH bakes USDm into paymasters, wallets, DEX routes, oracles, and app services. Gas can be paid cheaply while USDT0 and cUSD remain supported routes. → Sequencer OPEX link: Reserve yield flows to a funding sink that offsets the L2’s sequencer costs. This inverts the usual fee-margin model and lets MegaETH run the sequencer at cost. 📌 𝐌𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐬 1. Reserve backing and mint/redeem → Backing: USDm v1 is economically equivalent to USDtb units sitting on BUIDL, with a liquidity sleeve in stablecoins to support redemptions. Reserve composition is adjustable by policy. → Mint/redeem path: On issuance, assets routed through venues become USDtb exposure. Atomic swap rails allow moving between USDtb and BUIDL 24/7, improving settlement finality and liquidity management. Redemptions unwind the path in reverse. 2. Yield routing to L2 costs • Computation: Net portfolio yield of reserves → USDm Reserve Yield Account → periodic transfer to Sequencer OPEX bucket. Gas prices can then track data and compute costs rather than a markup. Why? As data costs change and throughput scales, fee volatility doesn’t need to be pushed to users to protect L2 margins. 3. Onchain, Ethena’s USDtb/USDe contracts provide ERC-20 interfaces and policy hooks. MegaETH then integrates paymaster support and router/oracle paths for USDm. ------ 📌 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐌𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐄𝐓𝐇 𝐀𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 MegaETH’s execution architecture is heterogeneous: ✔️ One active sequencer ✔️ Full nodes, ✔️ Replica nodes (apply diffs without re-execution), and ✔️ Prover nodes. It targets ~10 ms latency and 100k+ TPS, secured by Ethereum and paired with EigenDA for data availability. The USDm design complements this by de-linking fee revenue from user surcharges and pinning it to reserve yield. ------ 📌 𝐃𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐩𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐑𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐬 1. MegaETH (MegaLabs): → Integrates USDm into wallets, paymasters, gas accounting, indexers, and routing. → Maintains a fee policy that prices gas at cost, funded by USDm yield. → Preserves competing stablecoin routes (USDT0, cUSD) to avoid lock-in. 2. Ethena → Operates the stablecoin stack and reserve policy for USDtb. Provides issuance, risk, disclosures, and protocol governance. 3. Securitize / BlackRock → BUIDL custody/transfer, investor compliance, and tokenized fund operations that underpin USDtb’s reserve quality and liquidity rails. ------ 📌 𝐀𝐝𝐯𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐬 → Fee Stability at Scale: Yield covers sequencer OPEX as usage rises, so MegaETH avoids hiking fees to defend margins. → Institutional Reserve quality: BUIDL and Securitize add a clear operational framework and integrations across CeFi/DeFi. → Adaptable Reserve Policy: Ethena’s stack allows shifting collateral mix (e.g., to include USDe exposure) if conditions change. ------ 📌 𝐑𝐢𝐬𝐤𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 (𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐏𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐲) → Reserve yield vs. OPEX mismatch: If short-rate yields compress or DA costs rise, yield may not fully cover sequencer costs, forcing policy changes or supplemental revenue. → Counterparty/compliance dependencies: Reliance on BUIDL/Securitize and associated investor frameworks introduces offchain and regulatory dependencies. → Smart-contract surface: USDtb, paymasters, routers, and OPEX routing add integration risk. I expect audits and management. → Liquidity pathing: Deep liquidity for USDT0 and cUSD will coexist. This means USDm needs competitive venue support to minimize routing slippage in practice. → Governance clarity: Who will manage reserve-mix changes for USDm, and how OPEX distributions are parameterized? This matters a lot to users and integrators. You can also check a simplified explanation of USDm, written by @St1t3h:

The price of $GATA has seen a sharp correction following its initial surge, leaving many traders and community members wondering what the future holds. After debuting strongly, the token has dropped significantly, with recent movements hovering around the lower end of its launch range. Despite the decline, trading activity remains steady, showing that liquidity and market interest are still present. Recent Price Movement $GATA has been trading in the $0.025 – $0.03 zone, reflecting a steep decline of more than 80% since its early highs. Much of this sell-off appears tied to early holders taking profit and the usual volatility that follows a new token’s entry into the market. Current levels suggest the token is searching for stability, with support forming near recent lows. Key Drivers Behind GATA’s Price Bullish Factors Adoption Potential: The project’s focus on compensating users for data contribution and addressing AI’s data shortages could give it long-term demand if adoption grows. Community Growth: A rapidly expanding user base indicates growing awareness, which can drive organic demand for the token. Future Partnerships: Collaborations in the AI and data economy could expand utility and strengthen GATA’s role in decentralized ecosystems. Bearish Factors Post-Launch Volatility: Sharp corrections are common after new tokens launch, and GATA has been no exception. Early profit-taking has weighed heavily on price. Token Unlock Risks: A large supply remains locked. As more tokens enter circulation, selling pressure may increase if demand doesn’t scale up accordingly. Unproven Sustainability: While the vision is strong, it remains to be seen whether usage and token demand can match initial expectations. Short-Term Outlook Over the coming weeks, $GATA is likely to consolidate between $0.02 – $0.04. If selling pressure eases, a rebound toward resistance around $0.05 is possible, but volatility will remain high. Conversely, a break below $0.025 could trigger another leg down. Medium to Long-Term Forecast By End of 2025: Stabilization is expected, with price potentially ranging between $0.02 – $0.03 as the market digests supply unlocks and adoption metrics. 2026–2027: With steady adoption and successful delivery on its data-driven utility, GATA could climb toward $0.06 – $0.10. 2028–2030: In a best-case scenario of strong partnerships, expanding user engagement, and proven demand, GATA may reach $0.12 – $0.15, though this will depend heavily on execution and broader market conditions. What to Watch Supply Unlocks: Tracking the release of locked tokens will be critical for anticipating price pressure. User Activity: Sustained growth in active contributors is a bullish signal for long-term value. Adoption Metrics: Real-world data usage and integrations into AI ecosystems will define GATA’s utility. Market Sentiment: Like most emerging tokens, GATA will remain highly sensitive to overall crypto trends. Conclusion: GATA’s price has faced heavy selling since its launch, but its future depends on whether it can convert early hype into lasting adoption. In the near term, stability and sideways trading are likely. Longer-term potential exists if the project can secure real-world usage, partnerships, and sustained community activity. Investors and traders should closely monitor token unlocks and utility growth, as these will be the key drivers shaping GATA’s price trajectory.

$OG Momentum’s still alive. → Entry: $24.30–$24.60 → Target 1: $25.70 → Target 2: $27.10 → Stop-loss: $23.10 → Invalidation: Break below $22.50 Analysis: $OG ripped from $13.5 lows into $25+ but unlike the usual blow-off top, this one’s holding structure and printing higher lows. Dip got scooped at $23.14 and price is recovering fast. Volume remains strong. Buyers are still aggressive, and as long as $23.10 holds, I’m playing for continuation into new highs. This setup’s still hot$OM $OG