Perpetual Protocol KursPERP

Now tracking @torosfinance on our Perp Volume Dashboard

$TRADOOR is showing diagonal/ascending support with stacked overhead liquidity after a Bitget listing — safe buys are buy-spikes in the green band (2.128–2.132) with strict structural stop at 2.111; aggressive breakout requires hourly reclaim above ~2.395 with >20-hr average volume. Bitget listing and campaign create short-term flow but this is still a thin-book, low-cap situation — treat position sizing and stop management as priority. Technical summary & trade plan (explicit) Structure: price compressed on ascending diagonal support (green shelf). Liquidity stacked above near 2.395 → 2.448 → 2.556. Short-term bias: neutral until either (A) clean retest and hold green shelf (bull bias) or (B) hourly close below 2.111 (bear flip). Actionable plans (pick one): A) Momentum (aggressive) Condition: hourly close > 2.395 with volume ≥ 20-hr avg. Entry ladder: 2.396 – 2.402 on confirmed retest. Stop: 1.5× ATR below entry (use TradingView ATR(14) reading; example below). Targets: T1 2.448 (trim 20–40%) → T2 2.480–2.528 (scale) → stretch to 2.556. B) Retest (safer) Condition: bullish wick + buy spike inside 2.128 – 2.132. Entry ladder: 2.130 across the band. Stop: close < 2.111 (structural). Targets: 2.395 → 2.448; scale as breakout confirms. C) Defensive / short (if structure fails) Condition: hourly close < 2.111 with rising sell volume. Action: reduce longs; consider light short after clean breakdown. Targets: 2.050–2.080; stop back above 2.180. Pre-trade checklist (hard pass/fail): hourly candle confirmation, volume ≥ 20-hr avg or OBV confirm, price > VWAP for longs, EMA ribbon / MACD alignment, no single whale sell wall at immediate resistance. Example sizing (numeric, step-by-step) Use these examples to convert risk into position size. Account = $10,000, risk = 1% = $100. Momentum example (illustrative) Entry = 2.400, Stop = 2.374 → distance = 0.026. Calculation: distance = 2.400 − 2.374 = 0.026. Size (units) = Risk / distance = 100 ÷ 0.026. Step-by-step: 100 ÷ 0.026 = 100 ÷ 0.026 → multiply numerator and denominator by 1000 → 100,000 ÷ 26 = 3,846.1538 → round to 3,846 TRADOOR. Entry cost = entry × size = 2.400 × 3,846 = (2.4 × 3846) = (3846 × 24) ÷ 10 = 92,304 ÷ 10 = $9,230.40. Retest example Entry = 2.130, Stop = 2.111 → distance = 0.019. Distance = 2.130 − 2.111 = 0.019. Size = 100 ÷ 0.019 = 100,000 ÷ 19 = 5,263.1579 → 5,263 TRADOOR (rounded). Entry cost = 2.130 × 5,263 = (2.13 × 5263) = (5263 × 213) ÷ 100 = (1,052,600 + 68,419) ÷ 100 = 1,121,019 ÷ 100 = $11,210.19. Always round sizes to a whole token and re-check with your exchange (slippage, minimal order sizes). Use 1.5× ATR for initial stops when ATR is available on your session. Macro & sector context (how TRADOOR fits) Exchange listing catalyst: TRADOOR was recently listed on Bitget (Innovation Zone), which typically brings large short-term inflows, airdrop/campaign participation, and heightened orderflow — expect elevated turnover and volatility around listing and campaign windows. Altcoin rotation: low-cap listings often move independently of BTC/ETH for short windows; however, sustained moves usually require broader altcoin strength or sector tailwinds (higher spot volume, lower BTC dominance). TRADOOR’s volume → market-cap turnover is currently high, signaling speculative flow rather than organic adoption. Tokenomics & supply flows Circulating supply: ~14.35M TRADOOR (about 23.9% of max 60M according to aggregators). Max supply / FDV: max supply 60,000,000 → FDV = price × 60M (watch if large locked allocations unlock). Concentration & incentives: public summaries show a concentrated holder base and aggressive affiliate/fee share programs (affiliate commissions cited in project overview), both of which can cause large single-wallet moves and high short-term volume. If the team/whales sell or unlock tokens, price pressure can appear quickly. What to watch here: vesting / unlock schedule (project docs / token contract), major whale addresses on block explorers, and any team or treasury wallet transfers to exchanges. On-chain signals & flows Exchange flows: monitor inflows to Bitget and other exchanges — sudden inflow → higher sell pressure potential; sustained outflow → accumulation narrative. Bitget listing pages and explorer data should be watched. Holder growth / active addresses: growing unique holders and transfer counts usually precede more sustainable liquidity; look at on-chain explorers for TRADOOR contract . Futures & funding: if perpetuals open on major venues, funding positivity/negativity affects risk-on flow — check Bitget/perp OI and funding once available. Sentiment & community Campaign noise: Bitget campaign + $12k TRADOOR reward increases short-term community participation and likely retail buy pressure. Expect high chatter in Telegram / TradingView ideas and a wave of inexperienced traders entering. Social signals to check: daily mentions on Twitter / TG, TradingView idea sentiment, and number of new holders (on-chain). If social sentiment spikes without on-chain accumulation, treat as FOMO. Market microstructure (orderbook, liquidity) Orderbook depth: low-cap listings often have thin depth above key resistance — look for concentrated asks at 2.395–2.448; large limit asks create resistance and wick zones. TradingView / Bitget orderbook snapshots show thin books beyond mid resistance. Slippage risk: when placing laddered entries, split orders across 2–4 fills to limit market impact. Avoid oversized single market buys in thin books. Spread & gas: on DEX pairs, spreads can widen — check quoted spread before placing orders, and build in slippage tolerance only as needed. Extended scenarios & timeframes Bull (fast breakout): reclaim 2.395 with >20-hr avg volume → measured run to 2.448 → 2.528 → 2.556. Expect wick tests at each supply cluster. Base (range): consolidation between 2.128–2.395 while volume normalizes — this gives multiple reentry opportunities for patient traders. Bear (structural fail): hourly close < 2.111 → slide toward 2.050–2.080 and possibly deeper if large sell flows or token unlocks occur. For longer-term holders: watch token unlocks/vesting and sustained user metric growth (volume, active traders on the protocol). Short-term, listing campaigns can create big spikes but also rapid returns/churn. Execution checklist & daily watchlist (practical) Confirm hourly candle + volume. Volume ≥ 20-hr average or OBV confirming flow. Price > VWAP for new long entries. No single large sell wall at immediate resistance (orderbook check). On-chain: no large deposit spikes to exchanges. News: check Bitget campaigns/withdrawal status before and after trades. Risk management (explicit rules) Max position per trade: no more than 2–3% of account on aggressive plays; 0.5–1% recommended for single low-cap names. Use 1.5× ATR for initial stops (ATR from TradingView on your session). Trim 20–40% at T1, scale out into resistance. Move stop to breakeven after first partial target. Immediate full exit if hourly candle closes below structural invalidation (2.111). Safe play: wait for buy spike 2.128–2.132 with wick + volume; stop <2.111. Aggressive: hourly reclaim >2.395 with >20-hr average volume → ladder to 2.396–2.402, targets 2.448 → 2.480–2.528 → 2.556. Risks: thin orderbook, concentrated token holders, listing campaign flip (fast in/out). Use strict sizing and ATR stops; trim into strength.

Some profitable narratives you can go all in for: &gt; stablecoin &gt; prediction market &gt; AI &gt; robotics &gt; defi &gt; RWA &gt; perp remember: going all in means going all in, not just buy tokens. What else did i miss?

⚠️ Altcoins are overloaded with leverage right now. • BTC market cap dominance: 58% • BTC open interest dominance: 38% Leverage in alts is nearly 50% higher than BTC, even though their market cap is 40% smaller. We saw the same setup in Dec 2024 and alts crashed hard. That’s why I’m cautious… perp-driven rallies usually don’t last.