can a stock be in multiple indexes? Complete Guide

This guide answers: can a stock be in multiple indexes? Yes — a single company or security can appear in multiple indices (broad-market, sector, style, and provider-specific) through index rules, m...

2025-12-26 16:00:00

By Lily Wong

Article rating

4.3

102 ratings

Bitget offers a variety of ways to buy or sell popular cryptocurrencies. Buy now!

A welcome pack worth 6200 USDT for new users! Sign up now!

Can a stock be in multiple indexes?

Asking "can a stock be in multiple indexes" is common among investors and issuers. In short: yes — a single company or security can be a constituent of more than one stock index (for example a broad-market index, a sector index, style/size indices, or indices by different providers). This happens because index families have different objectives and selection rules, because companies may issue multiple share classes or list shares on more than one exchange, and because depositary receipts (like ADRs) and corporate actions create separate tradable instruments.

This article explains how index inclusion works, the ways the same stock can appear in multiple indices, how major providers treat multi-class shares and dual listings, the implications for issuers and investors, practical risks (overlap, liquidity, governance), and provides examples and a short FAQ. You will learn what to watch for when building portfolios or evaluating index-tracking products.

Note: As of June 2024, according to S&P Dow Jones Indices methodology summaries, providers maintain detailed eligibility and weighting rules that determine inclusion across index families. As of May 2024, Nasdaq methodology documents highlight multiple share-class eligibility in certain cases. As of November 2023, legal and industry analyses (e.g., major law firm summaries) documented evolving index provider policies on multi-class voting structures.

Overview / Short answer

Can a stock be in multiple indexes? Yes. Typical scenarios include a large-cap company appearing in a broad-market index (e.g., large-cap benchmark), a sector index (e.g., technology), a style index (growth or value), and one or more provider-specific indices (S&P, Russell, MSCI, FTSE). The practical significance: appearing in several indices can increase visibility and passive demand, affect liquidity, and create overlapping exposures for investors who hold multiple index funds or ETFs.

How index inclusion works

Index objectives and families

Indexes are designed with different goals. Common index families include:

Broad-market indices: aim to capture the performance of a wide market segment (e.g., top 500 U.S. stocks by market cap or a national market composite).
Size indices: segment companies by market capitalization (large-cap, mid-cap, small-cap).
Sector indices: group companies by industry classification (technology, healthcare, energy).
Style indices: classify by investment style, such as growth or value.
Factor or smart-beta indices: select constituents based on characteristics such as momentum, quality, low volatility, or dividend yield.

Because these families target different characteristics, the same company can meet criteria for several: a large-cap technology company with high earnings growth may be in a broad-market index, a technology sector index, a large-cap growth index, and one or more factor indices. In other words, differing index objectives make multiple inclusions common.

Index weighting methods and selection (cap-weighted, price-weighted, equal-weighted, rules vs. committee)

Index construction methods affect whether and how a security is included:

Market-capitalization-weighted: the most common approach; constituents are weighted by market cap (often adjusted for free float). Large companies typically have sizable weights, making them obvious inclusions across cap-weighted indices.
Price-weighted: weights depend on share price (historic example: Dow Jones Industrial Average). High-priced stocks may dominate such indices even if market cap is moderate.
Equal-weighted: each constituent has the same weight; this can change inclusion thresholds and sector tilts.
Rules-based vs. committee selection: some indices are strictly rules-driven (e.g., based on market cap and liquidity thresholds), while others allow a committee to make judgment calls that can limit or expand inclusion.

Different weighting and selection mechanisms explain why the same company might appear in one provider’s index but not in another’s. For example, a firm may meet Nasdaq-100 eligibility criteria yet fail to meet S&P 500 requirements because of differences in liquidity, listing venue, or profitability screens.

Index provider methodologies and eligibility criteria

Index providers (S&P Dow Jones, Russell/FTSE families, MSCI, Nasdaq, and others) publish methodologies that specify eligibility filters such as:

Market capitalization thresholds
Liquidity and trading-volume minimums
Free-float or publicly available shares requirements
Primary listing exchange or venue
Minimum public-company operating history or profitability (seasoning)
Corporate governance or share-class limitations (voting vs. non-voting shares)

Providers apply these criteria differently. For example, Russell reconstitutions follow a defined calendar and use size cutoffs, while S&P indices combine objective rules with committee oversight for certain decisions. MSCI and FTSE may impose free-float or voting-rights constraints that affect companies with unusual share structures.

Ways a stock can appear in multiple indexes

Inclusion in multiple indices from the same provider

The same provider can include a company in several indices within its own family. Examples include:

A company in a broad market index (e.g., an S&P composite) and simultaneously in the provider’s sector or sub-indices.
Placement in a size-based index (e.g., S&P 500 vs. S&P MidCap 400 historically as corporate size changes) and inclusion in a thematic or factor product offered by the same provider.

Note: some composite rules matter — for example, S&P Composite index families may define membership relationships (e.g., the S&P Composite 1500 is constructed from S&P 500, S&P MidCap 400, and S&P SmallCap 600). Providers set rules that sometimes exclude duplicates across sibling indices or otherwise define how overlapping families are assembled.

Inclusion across different providers (S&P, Russell, Nasdaq, MSCI, FTSE)

Different index providers run independent selection processes. The same company can be included simultaneously in multiple providers’ indices — for instance a firm can be a constituent of S&P 500, Russell 1000, MSCI country/regional indices, and FTSE benchmarks — because each index uses separate eligibility tests and reconstitution schedules.

This cross-provider inclusion is routine for large, liquid multinational companies, and it explains why many global blue-chip names are components of multiple global, regional, and sector indices at the same time.

Multiple share classes and index treatment

Companies sometimes issue more than one share class (e.g., Class A voting shares and Class B non-voting shares). Index treatment varies:

Some providers treat each share class as a separate security and may include both classes in different indices if each meets eligibility rules.
Other providers aggregate share classes at the company level (counting the combined free-float market cap) and include only a single representative listing.

As of May–June 2024, provider policies have been evolving: Nasdaq historically allowed multiple classes to be eligible under certain circumstances, while S&P, FTSE, and MSCI have refined or tightened rules to restrict new multi-class inclusions to address governance concerns, sometimes grandfathering existing constituents.

Dual listings and depositary receipts (ADRs)

Dual listings occur when a company lists shares on more than one exchange; depositary receipts (such as American Depositary Receipts, ADRs) enable trading of a foreign company’s equity in a local currency. Both mechanisms can lead to index inclusion:

A domestic primary listing may be eligible for a domestic index, while the ADR or cross-listed share may be eligible for local or regional indices.
Index providers typically define eligibility around a primary listing venue or the float on a particular market; in some cases, the ADR itself is the tradable security included in an index or tracked by funds.

For investors, ADR or dual-listing inclusion means exposure to the company via locally traded instruments without dealing with foreign settlement directly.

Spin-offs, demergers and corporate actions

Corporate events such as spin-offs, demergers, or recapitalizations can create new securities (new share classes, separate listed entities) that may be treated as distinct constituents by index providers. Providers publish corporate-action rules describing when and how a newly created security becomes eligible for index inclusion (seasoning periods, trading-volume tests, and corporate-action adjustments).

Index provider rules and notable policy changes

S&P Dow Jones

S&P Dow Jones Indices maintains detailed methodologies for its U.S. and global indices. Rules commonly include market-cap, liquidity, and residency requirements. As of June 2024, S&P’s methodology notes that composite indices have relationships (e.g., the S&P Composite 1500 is made up of component indices) and that existing multi-class constituents have sometimes been grandfathered even as new policy changes limit future inclusions.

Providers may apply committee discretion for certain entries and maintain public documentation explaining reasons for additions or deletions.

FTSE Russell and MSCI policies

FTSE Russell and MSCI apply free-float and governance screens that can affect companies with non-standard voting arrangements. Over recent years, both providers signaled stricter scrutiny of multi-class share structures and of securities with limited public float. Some policy shifts included grace periods or grandfathering to preserve continuity for existing constituents; new multi-class share structures may face higher hurdles.

As of late 2023 and early 2024, legal and industry summaries documented these policy shifts and the knock-on effects for index-eligible companies and passive funds.

Nasdaq rules

Nasdaq’s index methodologies often permit multiple share classes to be eligible under defined rules. Nasdaq’s selection processes focus on market cap and liquidity but explicitly describe how multiple share classes from the same company are treated. For certain Nasdaq indices, each trading symbol that meets eligibility criteria can be considered a constituent, which means different classes can appear simultaneously if permitted.

Implications for companies and investors

For issuers

Benefits of appearing in multiple indices include enhanced visibility, potential inclusion in a wider set of passive funds and ETFs, and often improved liquidity and investor interest. Index inclusion can create predictable demand from index-tracking funds, which can support share-price stability or upward pressure at times of reconstitution.

Some companies deliberately restructure share-class or listing arrangements to improve eligibility for target indices; others may avoid multi-class structures to comply with index-provider governance preferences.

For investors and funds

Multiple index inclusion produces important effects:

Overlap: Investors holding several index funds (e.g., S&P 500 plus Nasdaq-100 ETFs) may have duplicated exposure to the same stocks.
Tracking differences: Differences in share-class treatment or regional listing choices can create tracking error between indices and replication products.
Concentration risk: If a company is large and appears in multiple cap-weighted indices, cumulative exposure across products can produce top-heavy allocation across the investor’s aggregate holdings.
Liquidity: Index inclusion commonly increases liquidity of a stock, but sudden reconstitution events can create short-term volatility.

Funds and portfolio managers need to assess overlap and consider how combined index exposures affect sector, style, or factor tilts.

For index funds and ETFs

Index funds replicate a target index and must hold the securities specified (including applicable share classes or ADRs). When a stock appears in multiple indices, separate funds tracking each index may both hold the security, but fund managers must follow the index provider’s stipulated share-class rules and corporate-action handling.

ETF issuers establish replication rules (full replication, sampling, or optimization) and reconcile share-class or ADR representation with the index methodology. During corporate actions or share-class changes, fund managers follow both the index provider guidance and their own prospectus rules.

Practical considerations and risks

Overlap and unintended tilts

Holding multiple index funds can create unintended duplication and style or sector tilts. For instance, combining a broad-market cap-weighted fund with a sector ETF may amplify exposure to a small number of large-cap companies that are common to both indices. Investors should analyze holdings overlap, weightings, and sector composition before combining products.

Tools and portfolio analytics can quantify overlap (e.g., percentage of portfolio assets in common names) to manage concentration.

Multi-class governance and voting concerns

Multi-class share structures raise governance questions when one class has superior voting rights. Index providers have increasingly factored governance into eligibility; some now limit or condition inclusion of securities with significant voting-right differentials. Institutional investors should be aware that a stock’s presence in multiple indices does not imply a uniform governance profile across all listed share classes.

Liquidity, trading and arbitrage effects

Index inclusion often increases trading volume and can narrow bid-ask spreads. When a stock is added to multiple widely tracked indices, demand from passive funds and ETF creation activity can create measurable buying pressure. Conversely, deletions can trigger selling.

ETF arbitrage mechanisms rely on the liquidity of underlying securities; if inclusion spans different share classes or instruments (e.g., ADRs), arbitrage trading becomes more complex and may affect spreads.

Examples and case studies

Large-cap companies in multiple indices

Large, liquid firms commonly appear in multiple indices. For example, major technology and consumer companies are often constituents of broad U.S. benchmarks, sector indices, and international provider indices simultaneously. Dual-listed multinationals (for example, a company with a primary listing on a London exchange and an ADR in the U.S.) can appear in local indices in both markets if each instrument and listing meet provider eligibility.

As of June 2024, many multinational blue-chips appear across S&P, MSCI, and FTSE families because of their market caps and global free-float availability.

Multi-class share examples and index responses

Well-known companies with multi-class share structures include Alphabet (Google), Meta (Facebook), and Berkshire Hathaway. Index providers have historically handled those cases differently: some indices include both classes when each class is publicly traded and meets eligibility; others consolidate at the corporate level or enforce limits. Several providers implemented policy changes over recent years that tightened rules for new multi-class listings while often grandfathering existing constituents.

Index maintenance, reconstitution, and corporate events

How and when providers add/remove constituents

Index providers publish calendars and rules for reconstitution and maintenance. Typical elements include:

Regular reconstitutions (annual, quarterly) where size and liquidity screens are applied.
Ongoing maintenance for corporate actions (mergers, spin-offs, bankruptcies) that trigger ad hoc changes.
Replacement policies specifying how and when a removed constituent is substituted.

Seasoning requirements or minimum trading histories are common for new listings to ensure sufficient trade data and liquidity before inclusion.

Treatment of new share classes and spin-offs

When new share classes or spin-offs arise, providers apply methodology rules for eligibility. Common practices include:

Applying seasoning periods or minimum trading-volume thresholds before a new security is eligible.
Treating spin-offs as distinct securities with separate eligibility checks; some providers may include spin-offs quickly if they inherit the parent’s market cap and liquidity, while others require a waiting period.
Grandfathering existing constituents when policy changes affect multi-class listings, while disallowing analogous future entries.

Definitions and technical terms

Index: a statistical measure representing the performance of a group of securities.
Index provider: an organization that constructs and maintains indices (e.g., S&P Dow Jones, MSCI, FTSE Russell, Nasdaq).
Constituent: a security that forms part of an index.
Market capitalization: total market value of a company’s outstanding shares (price × shares).
Free float: portion of a company’s shares available for public trading (excluding restricted holdings).
Depositary receipt / ADR: a negotiable certificate issued by a bank representing shares of a foreign company, enabling local-market trading.
Dual listing: when a company’s shares are listed on more than one exchange.
Share class: different types of shares a company may issue (e.g., differing voting rights).
Cap-weighted: an index weighting method using market capitalization.
Price-weighted: weights determined by share price.
Reconstitution: the periodic process of updating index constituents.

Frequently asked questions (FAQ)

Q: Does being in multiple indices increase a stock’s price?

A: Index inclusion can create incremental demand from index-tracking funds, which may support price appreciation around the inclusion date. However, many factors influence price, and multiple inclusions do not guarantee sustained price increases.

Q: Can the same share class be in two indices simultaneously?

A: Yes. The same exact share class (same ticker) can be included in multiple indices if it meets each index’s eligibility and weighting rules.

Q: Can a company’s different share classes be in different indices at once?

A: Potentially. Some providers treat each traded share class as a separate security and may include one class in an index while excluding another, depending on meeting eligibility criteria.

Q: How do ETFs handle multiple-class companies?

A: ETF issuers follow the index methodology: if the index includes a particular share class, the ETF must replicate that exposure. When indices consolidate share classes or when corporate actions occur, ETF managers follow both the index provider guidance and fund prospectus rules to adjust holdings.

References and further reading

S&P Dow Jones Indices — S&P U.S. Indices Methodology (index construction rules, composite behavior). (As of June 2024, S&P methodology documents describe composite index composition and eligibility.)
Nasdaq — Nasdaq-100 Index Methodology (multiple share-class eligibility and selection criteria). (As of May 2024, Nasdaq materials note multiple-class treatment in specific index rules.)
Investopedia — How Dual Listings Allow Stocks to Trade on Multiple Exchanges (depositary receipts and dual listings overview).
WSGr (law firm summaries) — Index provider policy changes on multi-class companies (S&P, FTSE Russell, MSCI). (As of November 2023, major policy shifts were summarized in industry notes.)
Charles Schwab — Limitations of Stock Indexes and weighting effects.
Vanguard — When index exposures mix but don’t match (differences among providers and investor implications).