Investors Gamble Big on AI with Leveraged ETF Surge
- AI investor enthusiasm drove 112 new leveraged/inverse ETFs in 2025, doubling 2024's total, with $17.7B in AI-focused assets. - Nvidia dominates the trend: its 2x ETF holds $4.56B, while options traders price $260B potential swings ahead of earnings reports. - Volatility spikes show risks: a 17% Nvidia drop triggered 34% losses in its 2x ETF, while new AI ETFs like Tradr 2x MDB surged 46% post-MongoDB news. - Critics warn of overcrowded markets and 0.96% average fees, cautioning retail investors may misu
Investor enthusiasm for artificial intelligence has led to a significant surge in leveraged and inverse exchange-traded funds (ETFs) centered around AI-focused stocks, particularly those tied to Nvidia , the leading chipmaker in the AI space. According to a Reuters analysis, 112 U.S.-listed leveraged and inverse ETFs were launched in 2025, compared to just 38 in the entire 2024 year. This reflects growing retail investor demand for products that amplify exposure to AI-driven companies like Nvidia and Tesla , as well as energy firms supporting AI data centers [1].
Leveraged and inverse ETFs, which typically use swaps or options to magnify returns, are now more than half of the 190 U.S.-listed single stock leveraged and inverse ETFs. These products collectively hold $23.7 billion in assets, with $17.7 billion focused on AI-related themes [1]. The GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF, for example, has amassed $4.56 billion in assets since its December 2022 launch [1]. This growing popularity underscores how pivotal investor perceptions of AI's future are shaping financial markets.
Nvidia, in particular, has drawn attention as a central figure in the AI investment narrative. According to analyst Bryan Armour of Morningstar , earnings reports from AI leaders like Nvidia are now pivotal events that can trigger significant market swings. Options traders are currently pricing in a potential $260 billion change in Nvidia’s market value after its upcoming earnings announcement [1]. The company’s performance has already demonstrated extreme volatility in leveraged ETFs, such as the GraniteShares 2x ETF, which fell nearly 34% following a 17% drop in Nvidia shares in late January [1].
The recent outperformance of AI-driven companies further illustrates the potential of these leveraged ETFs. On Tuesday, shares of MongoDB surged over 23% in after-hours trading after the firm reported strong AI-related client growth. This triggered a 46% gain in the Tradr 2x Long MDB Daily ETF, launched just two weeks prior [1]. Such movements highlight the volatility and speculative nature of these products, which can magnify gains but also expose investors to greater downside risk.
Critics and industry experts have raised concerns about the risks associated with leveraged ETFs, particularly their complexity and potential for losses. Dave Nadig, president of ETF.com, warned that the market for these products is becoming “overcrowded” and that a “shakeout” may occur [1]. These ETFs typically charge higher fees—averaging 0.96%—compared to the industry average of 0.54%. While some argue that these products fulfill a clear demand for AI exposure, others caution that retail investors may not fully understand how leveraged ETFs perform over time, especially during periods of high volatility or when holding positions beyond short-term horizons [1].
Source:

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Decoding Investor Behavior: How the Probability-Range Reflection Effect Shapes Risk Preferences and Asset Allocation
- The probability-range reflection effect (UXRP) extends prospect theory, revealing how investors' risk preferences shift across six domains based on probability levels and gain/loss contexts. - Low-probability losses trigger risk-seeking behavior (e.g., distressed assets), while high-probability gains favor risk-averse choices (e.g., stable dividends), shaped by non-linear probability weighting. - Domain-specific strategies emerge: investment domains prioritize index funds in high-probability gains and sp

Crypto Fear & Greed Index in 'Fear' Territory: A Strategic Buying Opportunity?
- The Crypto Fear & Greed Index shows conflicting readings (39 "Fear" vs. 50 "Neutral") on August 30, 2025, reflecting market uncertainty. - Divergent methodologies highlight volatility, whale liquidations, and macro risks like delayed Fed cuts versus stable trading volumes and social media activity. - Historically, "Fear" signals oversold conditions, but current "Neutral" readings caution against over-optimism, requiring multi-indicator analysis. - Contrarian strategies suggest DCA, options hedging, and a

Ethereum's $5,000 Potential vs. XRP's $2.50 Risk: A Strategic Look at Key Technical Indicators and Market Sentiment
- Ethereum’s institutional adoption and ETF inflows drive its $5,000 potential, bolstered by SEC reclassification and bullish technical patterns. - XRP faces $2.50 risk due to fragile technical structure, weak RSI momentum, and unresolved regulatory uncertainties despite commodity reclassification. - Diverging trajectories highlight strategic importance of monitoring ETH’s $4,300 support and XRP’s $3.00/2.50 thresholds for institutional and retail investors.

Asymmetric Opportunities in Silver: How Housing Demographics and Regulatory Challenges Fuel Precious Metal Demand
- U.S. housing affordability crisis deepens due to demographic shifts, aging populations, and restrictive zoning laws, creating a structural supply-demand mismatch. - Silver demand surges over 50% since 2023 as investors seek inflation hedges, driven by solar energy growth and industrial applications in EVs and semiconductors. - iShares Silver Trust (SLV) offers low-cost, physically backed exposure to silver, outperforming mining ETFs with 0.50% fees and direct bullion holdings. - Regulatory reforms and ge

Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








