DOJ Criminal Division chief says open source smart contract devs not criminally liable without intent
Justice Department (DOJ) Criminal Division head Matthew Galeotti declared that writing code without criminal intent does not constitute a crime, providing crypto developers and smart contract creators with clearer boundaries on criminal liability.
During remarks at the American Innovation Project Summit on Aug. 21, Galeotti stated:
“Our view is that merely writing code without ill intent is not a crime. Innovating new ways for the economy to store and transmit value and create wealth without ill intent is not a crime.”
The comments represent the Justice Department’s most explicit guidance yet on developer responsibility in the digital asset ecosystem.
Developer liability limits
The Criminal Division addressed industry concerns about holding smart contract developers criminally liable for operating unlicensed money transmitting businesses.
Galeotti stressed that developers contributing code to open source projects without specific criminal intent face no liability for aiding and abetting violations.
He explained:
“If a developer merely contributes code to an open source project without the specific intent to assist criminal conduct, aid or abet a particular crime, or join a criminal conspiracy, he or she is not criminally liable.”
Both aiding and abetting charges and conspiracy prosecutions require prosecutors to prove specific intent, establishing a higher evidentiary standard for developer cases.
The guidance directly responds to defense counsel presentations raising concerns about criminal liability for smart contract developers and code publishers not otherwise involved in peer-to-peer transactions.
The Criminal Division acknowledged these as “complex questions of law and fact” requiring rigorous case-by-case evaluation.
Unlicensed money transmission protections
For unlicensed money transmission charges under 18 USC 1960, the department will not prosecute regulatory violations absent evidence that defendants knew specific legal requirements and willfully violated them.
Galeotti provided specific protections for truly decentralized software that automates peer-to-peer transactions without third-party custody or control over user assets, stating:
“Where the evidence shows that software is truly decentralized and solely automates peer-to-peer transactions, and where a third party does not have custody and control over user assets, new 1960(b)(1)(C) charges against a third party will not be approved.”
The guidance considers regulatory guidance suggesting that non-custodial crypto software does not constitute unlicensed money transmission.
Further, Galeotti established clear principles distinguishing between legitimate development and criminal conduct.
Developers of neutral tools with no criminal intent should not be held responsible for third-party misuse of their creations. When third parties violate criminal law using developer tools, prosecutors should target the misusing party rather than well-intentioned creators.
The DOJ official described the department’s technology-neutral approach, which treats digital asset crimes identically to traditional financial violations while protecting lawful innovation from regulatory overreach.
The post DOJ Criminal Division chief says open source smart contract devs not criminally liable without intent appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Decoding the One Solana Scholarship: Behavioral Economics and the Future of Risk-Taking in Web3
- The One Solana Scholarship (OSS) merges education with behavioral experiments in decentralized risk-taking and governance. - SSK ETF (7.3% staking yield) exploits behavioral economics principles like the reflection effect to manage market volatility perceptions. - MAXI meme coin's 50-stage presale highlights domain-specific risk preferences, contrasting with OSS's ESG-aligned educational approach. - OSS addresses governance gaps through milestone-based grants and open-source tools, mitigating centralizat

Traders Hold Breath as ARB Balances on $0.50 Pivotal Threshold
- ARB consolidates near $0.49 with RSI at 49.75, signaling neutral momentum and potential breakout above $0.50. - $872M inflow boosts Arbitrum's ecosystem, but 92.65M token unlock on Sept 16 risks short-term volatility. - Technical indicators show equilibrium at $0.50 pivot, with $0.43 support and $0.60 resistance as key levels for directional clarity.

Bitcoin's Institutional Adoption and Price Momentum: The Role of Peter Diamandis and Strategic Investment
- Peter Diamandis advocates Bitcoin as a $300K 2025 target, citing scarcity and institutional adoption potential despite lacking verified institutional backing. - Institutional investors favor Ethereum's smart contract capabilities over Bitcoin, with ETF inflows contrasting Bitcoin's outflows and shifting market dynamics. - Diamandis's influence amplifies Bitcoin's narrative for cross-border finance but remains sentiment-driven without concrete institutional commitments from Singularity University. - Marke

Ripple’s Strategic Edge in Cross-Border Payments with XRP Liquidity
- Ripple’s XRP-powered Payments platform enables instant, low-cost cross-border settlements via RLUSD, bypassing SWIFT’s inefficiencies. - Japanese firm Gumi invests $17M in XRP for infrastructure, while ODL processed $1.3T in Q2 2025, serving 300+ institutions. - Post-SEC resolution, XRP supports CBDCs in Palau and Bhutan, and RLUSD’s Aave integration bridges DeFi with traditional finance. - XRP’s neutrality and interoperability challenge USDC/Stripe, positioning it as a critical bridge for fiat-stablecoi

Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








