Bitcoin Is "bad For Dictators": The Revelation Of A Human Rights Expert

At a Washington summit on Bitcoin-related policies, Alex Gladstein, strategist at the Human Rights Foundation, made a shocking statement: “Bitcoin is bad for dictators.” For him, it is a tool of resistance against authoritarian regimes. A stance that resonates even more strongly as the United States, on their side, quietly builds their own strategic BTC reserve.

Bitcoin decimates authoritarian control

Alex Gladstein, Chief Strategy Officer at the Human Rights Foundation , delivered an unequivocal message at the Bitcoin Policy Summit in Washington.

Before an assembly of American policymakers, he stated that bitcoin “literally saves” citizens living under authoritarian regimes.

“Bitcoin is bad for dictators,” he declared , highlighting how this technology weakens the traditional levers of control used by oppressive states.

According to Gladstein, dictatorships generally rely on three tools to maintain their hold:

• Hyperinflation, which erodes savings and impoverishes the population.
  
• Freezing bank accounts to stifle any opposition.
  
• Financial surveillance to identify and neutralize dissidents.
  

If you hold your bitcoins yourself, governments can neither erase nor freeze them, and they certainly cannot inflict hyperinflation on you.

In countries where the economy falters and fundamental freedoms are threatened, this form of financial independence becomes a vital bulwark.

From Ukraine to the United States, a strategic adoption

The story of bitcoin as a tool of resistance takes root in 2013, during the Ukrainian revolution.

As pro-democracy protesters defy Viktor Yanukovych’s authoritarian regime, the Human Rights Foundation discovers for the first time the subversive potential of this still nascent digital currency.

“It was very early in bitcoin’s lifecycle; bitcoin was worth about a hundred dollars back then; we were very skeptical about its effectiveness“, recalls Alex Gladstein.

Facing frozen bank accounts, pro-democracy protesters were looking for a way to fund their actions without going through traditional channels.

Bitcoin fulfilled this role: it allowed them to “send value where traditional money could no longer circulate“.

This first-hand experience reinforced HRF’s intuition: bitcoin can now bypass locked banking systems and offer a financial lifeline to oppressed activists.

Since then, the organization supports many movements worldwide by relying on this resilient technology.

The irony of the story? This weapon of liberation now appeals to great powers. The United States, under the Donald Trump administration, accumulates bitcoin through judicial seizures. Objective: to build a national strategic reserve . Bitcoin reveals its dual nature: shield of the oppressed, sword of sovereign states.

Gladstein warns, however: the effectiveness of this technology depends on rigorous use. “If they use bitcoin correctly, without associating it with their identity“, citizens can escape surveillance. But a simple technical negligence can compromise everything.

In sum, bitcoin is gradually establishing itself as a major geopolitical force. On one side, it emancipates citizens from authoritarian regimes. On the other, it becomes an instrument of power for Western democracies . This duality redefines global balances and could well transform the very nature of political power in the 21st century.